爱上海同城

Media review network infringement incident: illegal, do you know? Deceive, what?

In the survey, please wait. If there is no response for a long time, please refresh this page to know the network: illegal, know if? Deceive, what? "Take me more than 100 articles to the database, not only don’t tell me, readers include my own download and pay, I never got a penny fee.

"Recently, nearly 90nd Zhongnan 上海普陀会所论坛 University of Economics and Law retired Professor Zhao Dexin confessed" China Zhizhu "infringement, paying 700,000 yuan, causing public opinion attention. What is more embarrassing is that Professor Zhao discussed back After fair, I know all the alasses from the Internet.

  As a result of the establishment of Tsinghua University and Tsinghua Tongfang, the company has developed rapidly under the strong support of the country, and now it has become the largest "CNKI Digital Library" in the world’s content.

However, in recent years, this should be a platform for intellectual property protection benchmarks and academic exchange public resources, but repeatedly questioned public opinion, there are many people who know the network monopoly academic resources. Zhang "net" pounces 上海嘉定kb油压 to commercial interests, but also Less netizens feel "How to know the Internet shop". How to use itself in the academic circular monopoly, develop the overlord terms, gain huge benefits, have been suffering from academic diseases. In this incident, Zhao Dexin, is invaded, wants to download his work on the Internet, but also pay it to the other party. "Why can’t I create a respect?" Zhao Dexin asked this question, and the voice of the scholars. Public opinion is questioned first, concentrated in the profit model and charging standards of the intersection. The financial news data shows that in 2020, the year’s income of NET is nearly 1.2 billion, and the gross profit margin is nearly 54%.

However, it is a stark contrast to high profit, but the author’s meager income.

According to reports, doctoral thesis, master’s thesis is published online, and the author can only get 100 yuan in cash and the retrieval card for 400 yuan. And the author’s paper is downloaded once in the knowledge network, and the platform will charge 15 yuan / this or even 25 yuan / book. Not only that, this high pricing has maintained steadily. It is reported that knowing the price increase of more than 10% each year, which makes many colleges who order their services.

In 2016, Peking University did even deactivate the network. Some netizens ridicule: "Write a paper not only hollowed out the brain, but also hollowed the wallet.

"This time, in the face of Professor Zhao’s rights, the knowledge of the resultion of compensation is fulfilled, but its later" lower "is handled, and many people have questioned the" initial heart "of China’s top academic website.

On the one hand, the authority of the knowledge is established above the sweat of scholars. It is the copyright of the copyright resource of the Chinese academic circles. On the other hand, these research results are "monopolistic". Become a "a big mountain" on the academic interface. How to collect the academic papers not only monopolize the academic papers, but also to monopolize academic evaluation resources. Knowledge creators must "prove" their own value by knowing the network – "I can search myself" "I have a few papers on the Internet" to become a variety of scholars’ titles and assessments. This is not difficult to explain, why are it infeding and not an example, but there are fresh experts who actively stood up and defend. "I have retired for so many years, don’t care about this.

I am most concerned about the "respect for knowledge creators’".

"Zhao Dexin said. On December 10th, China Zhoma.com released the" Professor Zhao Dexin’s Profit Prosecution of China ", said to Zhao Dexin, and put forward will properly handle its work to continue to spread the platform problem.

Zhao Dexin also said that I hope that knowing the Internet can take out specific rectification measures, truly take out their sincerity to solve the problem, rather than staying on the surface.

  How to know the apparent public welfare attribute should represent the image and atmosphere of China.

Such a platform supported by the state and masters many academic resources should be the 上海指压飞机店 primary orientation of the academic needs of the scholars, rather than the character, one network, and the "knowledge" is based on the case without the original author license. In exchange for commercial interests. For any knowledge reserves and knowledge payment platforms, respect for knowledge creators should be the bottom line that is always adhered! (This newspaper commentator Yuan Quan).